NBR is better off waiting than taking small hesitant steps

Yesterday the National Bank of Romania chose to wait instead of acting. The pressure, mainly from the banking sector, was on NBR to cut rates.  Amid global slowdown, at prima facie, the decision taken yesterday seems to be the wrong one. In the same time I believe that a cut of only 0.25% would have been pointless. Moreover,  in a country with a history of high inflation the decisions to cut rates  too early in the dis-inflationary process could have wreaked havoc for inflationary expectations . What monetary policy needs in Romania is a bold move if it wants to have a real effect. Of course always keeping in mind their current mandate of bringing inflation at the communicated targets.

In my view there are three reasons for NBR not doing anything right now:

1) A small decrease in key policy rate does not have any impact on the lending market or the real economy

2) It is waiting to get confirmation of global recession

3) It is waiting to get confirmation that the recent inflation developments are sustainable

 

Below is the entire statement from NBR. Highlights and italics are my own.

Press Release of the Board of the National Bank of Romania

29.09.2011

In its meeting of September 29, 2011, the Board of the National Bank of Romania decided the following:

  • to keep unchanged the monetary policy rate at 6.25 percent per annum;
  • to ensure adequate management of liquidity in the banking system;
  • to maintain the existing levels of minimum reserve requirement ratios on both leu-denominated and foreign currency-denominated liabilities of credit institutions.

The NBR will further monitor domestic and global economic developments so as, by accordingly adjusting its available instruments, to ensure the fulfillment of its objectives of achieving and maintaining price stability in the medium term as well as financial stability.

The analysis of developments in macroeconomic indicators shows a faster disinflation, in line with the central bank’s expectations. The annual inflation rate slid for the third consecutive month to reach 4.25 percent in August versus 7.93 percent in June, amid a steep reduction in volatile food prices and the gradual fading-out of the first-round effect of the VAT hike in July 2010. Moreover, the annual adjusted CORE21 inflation fell to 2.92 percent in August against 4.74 percent in June.

It is clear that looking back inflation is falling towards target, as per previous paragraph. But in the next we see that NBR is still concerned about inflationary pressures in the months ahead. Also, note that NBR still refers to moderate exchange rate volatililty contributing to tighter monetary conditions. Translation: do not expect sharp depreciation of the RON against major currencies.

Disinflation is expected to continue in the period ahead, so that annual inflation rate will near the target. The faster disinflation while keeping the monetary policy rate unchanged and amid a moderate leu exchange rate volatility translates into a tightening of real broad monetary conditions aimed at supporting the convergence of inflation towards the medium-term objectives.

The resumption of economic growth continued, albeit at a slower pace, amid a worsening of global risk appetite and of the outlook for growth worldwide, as well as amid increased uncertainties regarding the eurozone sovereign debt crisis. The dynamics of industrial output and exports moderated, while the revival of loans to the private sector, especially leu-denominated lending, remained sluggish. The slower pace of the Romanian economy is expected to be temporarily countered by the good agricultural output in the second half of this year.

In the next paragraph we see NBR’s attempt to introduce some predictability to the monetary policy. I guess some can read this as proof that NBR will cut key policy rate at the next meeting on November 2nd. But I would not be so sure. The main macro variables will still show some growth in the economy but they are mostly backward looking. To lower rates NBR will have to take a decision based on a forecast which will show an economy on the edge of recession. In Romania today I am not sure that such forecast will be made public. Thus, unless NBR does a major shift in the way it takes decisions I do not expect a cut on November 2nd. The best we can hope for is cut in MRR for RON and maybe a decrease of the interval around the key policy rate (+4% Lombard rate and -4% O/N deposit with and NBR). For a cut to have any effect it needs to be at least 100 bps.

The prospects reveal a consolidation of disinflation, but also persistent uncertainties related to developments in the external environment, capital flows, as well as administered and some volatile prices. Therefore, the central bank will gradually adjust the monetary policy stance, in line with these developments and in the context of fulfilling the Romanian authorities’ commitments under the external financing arrangements with international institutions.

Ensuring price stability, together with maintaining financial stability, paves the way for a sustainable cut in the costs of leu-denominated loans, a process fostered by the NBR. The resumption of lasting economic growth should also consider a boost of leu-denominated saving, which would secure sustainability of the external deficit and gradually reduce reliance on external financing.

In this context, the NBR Board decided to keep the monetary policy rate at 6.25 percent per annum, to further pursue an adequate management of liquidity in the banking system and maintain unchanged the minimum reserve requirements for both leu and foreign currency-denominated liabilities of credit institutions.

The NBR will further monitor domestic and global economic developments so as, by accordingly adjusting its available instruments, to ensure the fulfilment of its objectives of achieving and maintaining price stability in the medium term as well as financial stability in the context of fulfilment of commitments under the external financing agreements with the European Union, the International Monetary Fund and other international institutions.

In line with the announced calendar, the next NBR Board meeting dedicated to monetary policy is scheduled for November 2, 2011, when the new quarterly Inflation Report is to be examined.

6 thoughts on “NBR is better off waiting than taking small hesitant steps

  1. I don’t agree with the NBR, and I’m still waiting for a real proof regarding their totally stupid wanna-be reasons for doing what they are doing. Killing the ron is the only option that makes sense to me considering everything those guyz are doing. And they got it totally wrong with this inflation shit. Unfortunately for them they can’t justify their view.

    1. You are obviously upset about something. My views on monetary policy are know let’s understand yours.

      1)What are they doing that you do not approve of?
      2) what do you mean by “killing the RON”?
      3)what is wrong with the “inflation shit” ?

  2. Totally upset🙂. It’s a lot be said. I’ll write about this, better.

    1. They should have the rate cut, not 0.25%, but much harder than this.
    2. The monetary policy of NBR is increasing the demand for loans denominated in euro, nobody wants the ron. The difference between the two rates, for the same amount, is huge, and we need really big changes to bring to loan rates, the one in ron and the one in euro, at a difference of at least 20%, from a difference of more than 70% today. This huge difference shows very clear that both the NBR rate and the ron are overvalued, and both of them should decrease in a visible way. If they don’t do this, we will continue to prefer euro denominated loans. They are killing our currency because nobody wants it. I’ve read that in the last 2 years there were 2bn euro loans for buying a house. How much of this debt is ron denominated? Almost nothing. Why? Let’s calculate the difference between the rates … On the companies side, for loans >5y, is the same.

    I think that they do with intention. I can’t imagine them being that stupid, which means that they do it with intention🙂. They wanna help people like Erste, SocGen, and not only, to bring their euro in Romania and spend them here. Is my only explanation for this monetary policy they are doing, Everything is designed to increase the demand for euro and decrease the demand for ron. It’s impossible not to see that there’s a huge difference between these rates and that the romanian people can’t prefer the ron denominated debt only because of your stupid rules, and because you say on the TV that we should do it. This is like circus.

    3. Inflation is not a monetary phenomenon, it comes from the real economy, from the lack of efficiency in the production process, from the lack of technology , lack of competition, and, overall, from the cost management of the companies. I’m waiting for a proof that inflation is indeed a monetary phenomenon and can be kept under control from the interest rate. I mean a proof from the real life, from the statistics, and generally speaking, not that just once in 10 years it worked, and not a theory from a book. If they can’t prove this, they should just let us alone, and don’t kill our currency for such a stupid reason.

  3. I think their rate should be 1.5%-2%, from hard times to better times, and 3% in the booming times, over euriobor, in order to keep a real competition between euro denominated and ron denominated loans. It should be 4% at the most, today. And is 6.25%. Huge!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s