On “Occupy Wall-Street”

Very sensitive issue but with a lot of legitimacy.

I do think that peaceful forms of protest are a very good way for common people to draw the attention of policy makers to a specific issue. Here we are dealing with the result of governments bailing the “big” guy in 2008 and then give “him” few more bucks to continue partying. In the same time the “little” guy had to pay the bills and in many cases also looking for a job. This “cocktail” was headed for this conclusion.

As I said before there was a social contract that the economic system used to work around: we all pay our bills. But when you see that if you are “big enough” this does not apply to you then you wonder about your rights. We have seen this a lot in Romania since 1999 until today and at times our people had the energy to protest it. Now it has hit what in my view used to be the cradle of capitalism, USA. Unfortunately steps taken since 2008 by policy makers in US put a big question mark, for me, around their view of capitalism.

So,yes I do understand the protesters. But as with such movements there is a lack of clear message. This might have to do first with the fact that the people there now are neither economists nor politicians. And without them the movement risks of being ridiculed for being unfocused.

This is my main concern. I am not sure what is the outcome they are hoping for from this movement. A clear and focused message would carry this movement forward and bring more people on board.

Here are two things I would ask for:
1) Make sure that banking losses do not get transferred to the “little ” guy via taxes and inflation
2) Make sure that “too big too fail” banks do not exist in the future (or in any industry)
3) what is the role of banks in a society? Is the banking sector different from any other industry?

What do you think the movement should ask for??


4 thoughts on “On “Occupy Wall-Street”

  1. Lack of clear message?! 1% v 99% is not clear enough?!
    Ok, I’ll sort of come back to what I wrote in my first post on your blog: economy, nor the capitalism, is not about “people”, about better living. All the Americans want – and that happened in the 60 as well – is just more of them to live better. Not all of them are idiots, uneducated, lazy, etc…still, yet they don’t have jobs, perspectives and reasons to get off bed.
    I really think that increasing number of “people” become aware of the split between the official rhetoric and the reality. Simply put it: lies. 🙂

    1. You have a good point. What I am saying is that if they make this just about revenge and confrontation it will not lead anywhere. It needs a platform and ideas on how to reform the system. Otherwise the guys in power will do the only thing they are comfortable with: carry on with the status quo.

  2. Precisely! The problem with the movement started in NY (again, similar with the Hippie movement back in 60ies) is that they have no alternative solutions. But, assuming that they have such strategic thinking, for sure some politicians will appear from nowhere and claim that they are the saviors and institute themselves as “leaders”.
    Of course, all of those will lead, predictably, to preservation of status quo…
    I am very simpathetic with this movement, but I don’t think it will prevail or generate any kind of change in the society, as a convention.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s